Prediction of Mackenzie Mcdonald [100th] vs Taro Daniel [123rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L L
Form
L L W W L L W L L LHead To Head: Mcdonald 2 - 3 Daniel
They have played 10 sets in total, with Mcdonald winning 4 and Daniel winning 6. The last match between Mcdonald and Daniel was at the Cagliari Challenger, 04-05-2023, Second, Clay with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mackenzie Mcdonald | 2 |
| Taro Daniel | 3 |
| Mcdonald | Stats | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (16-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 27% (4-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 3 |
| 100 | Ranking | 123 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 29 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 14 |
| 56% (329-257) | Career Total W/L | 58% (573-421) |
| $3,287,250 | Career Prize Money | $2,262,594 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Taro Daniel
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(6) |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Taro Daniel
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 3 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 47 | Games Won | 46 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:22:50 | Average Match Time | 1:22:50 |
| 60% (175/291) | 1st Serve % | 59% (164/279) |
| 69% (120/175) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (105/164) |
| 54% (63/116) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (65/115) |
| 48% (12/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (11/27) |
| 39% (109/279) | Return Points Win % | 37% (108/291) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Taro Daniel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mcdonald 2 - 3 Daniel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mcdonald has won 46.31% of points on their second serve, while Daniel has won 43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mcdonald, in recent form, has won 45.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel has won 40.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.52% and 21.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mcdonald has saved 49.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel has saved 57.87% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mcdonald has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 42/ 30), with Daniel winning 44.26% (W/L 27/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mcdonald has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 215/ 151), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 23/ 37). Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 304/ 203), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Mcdonald has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10), where as Daniel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 16/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Mcdonald winning 2 times and Daniel being victorious 3 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Mcdonald winning 4 and Daniel winning 6. The last match between Mcdonald and Daniel was at the Cagliari Challenger, 04-05-2023, Second, Clay with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mcdonald and Daniel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mcdonald winning 0 times and Daniel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mcdonald winning 0, and Daniel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mcdonald has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.81 while Daniel has played against players with an average rank of 187.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mcdonald has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mcdonald has converted 27.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel has converted 25.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Mackenzie Mcdonald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
13
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Pavel Kotov
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 6-7(4) 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
121)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
10
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mathis Bondaz
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Alex Rybakov
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(9) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Mcdonald vs Daniel?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Mcdonald Vs Daniel is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (329/257) | Win/Loss | 58% (573/421) |
| 55% (790/636) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1316/1033) |
| 52% (7081/6554) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11470/10587) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2374 | Aces Total | 2467 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1330 | Total Double Faults | 1994 |
| 1:33:6 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 156.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 166.75 |
| 63% (25227/39907) | 1st Serve % | 63% (35491/56755) |
| 70% (17586/25227) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (24080/35491) |
| 51% (7523/14680) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10829/21255) |
| 42% (1607/3806) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2402/5588) |
| 39% (15816/40648) | Return Points Win % | 39% (21978/55972) |
| 57% (305/536) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (549/934) |
| 45% (21/47) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (13/49) |
| 50% (95/189) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (162/307) |
| 46% (82/178) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (148/297) |
| 80% (342/275) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (590/498) |
| 20% (342/67) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (590/91) |
| 22% (244/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (404/72) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
